Luuk van Seeters l about

Tendering Forms: From Turnkey to Design & Build

In executing a construction project, the choice of tendering form plays a crucial role in how the project is undertaken, managed, and completed. The selected tendering form can significantly influence costs, timelines, and the quality of the final result. In this blog, we will explore several common tendering forms, including turnkey, design & build, and other popular options, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Turnkey

A turnkey project is a tendering form where the contractor is responsible for the entire project, from design to delivery. The client provides the requirements and specifications, and the contractor delivers a ready-to-use product.

Advantages:

Single Point of Contact: The client has only one contact person for the entire project, which simplifies communication and coordination.
Fixed Price: Turnkey projects are often offered at a fixed price, helping to prevent budget overruns.
Time Efficiency: The contractor manages the entire process, which can lead to faster completion through an integrated approach.

Disadvantages:

Less Influence on Design: The client has less influence on the design and execution once the project has started.
Potential Quality Issues: Since the contractor is responsible for both design and execution, quality issues may arise that can be difficult to address.

Design & Build

In the design & build tendering form, both design and execution are handled by the same entity. The client selects one company that performs both the design and construction.

Advantages:

Integrated Approach: Since design and execution occur under one roof, design and construction errors can be minimized.
Cost Efficiency: The collaboration between designers and builders can lead to cost savings through optimal alignment of design and execution.
Accelerated Delivery: The integration of design and execution can shorten the time from concept to completion.

Disadvantages:

Limited Choice: The client has less freedom of choice, as one entity is responsible for both phases.
Reduced Competition: Combining design and construction may limit competition on price and quality.

Design-Bid-Build (DBB)

In the design-bid-build tendering form, design and construction are separated. First, the design is completed, and then the project is tendered to various contractors who submit bids based on the design.

Advantages:

Clear Design: The design is fully completed before construction begins, which helps avoid misunderstandings and errors during execution.
Competition: Multiple contractors have the opportunity to bid, which can lead to a better price for the client.

Disadvantages:

Longer Duration: Separating design and execution can extend the overall project timeline.
Coordination Issues: There may be a lack of collaboration between the design and execution phases, leading to conflicts and delays.

Construction Management at Risk (CMAR)

In the construction management at risk tendering form, a construction manager (CM) is involved who oversees the construction and costs, with a guaranteed maximum price. The design is carried out by a separate party, while the CM manages the construction and risks.

Advantages:

Risk Management: The construction manager guarantees a maximum price, which helps prevent cost overruns.
Flexibility: There is room for changes during the design phase without major impacts on the budget.

Disadvantages:

Complexity: The separation between design and execution can lead to more complex project management.
Reduced Control: The client has less control over execution compared to a turnkey or design & build project.

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)

Integrated Project Delivery is a collaborative model where all key stakeholders (client, designer, contractor, and sometimes suppliers) are involved from the start of the project. The goal is to share responsibility for the project outcome.

Advantages:

Collaboration: Early involvement of all parties fosters collaboration and innovation, which can lead to higher quality outcomes.
Efficiency: Joint decision-making can result in cost savings and time efficiencies.

Disadvantages:

Complex Structures: Managing all interests and responsibilities effectively can be complex.
Dependence: Success heavily relies on the collaboration and communication among all involved parties.

Conclusion

Choosing the right tendering form depends on the nature and scope of the project, the parties involved, and the client's specific needs and requirements. Whether you opt for turnkey, design & build, design-bid-build, CMAR, or IPD, each model has its own advantages and disadvantages. It is essential to understand how each model works and how it can impact the execution of your project.

Do you have questions about which tendering form best suits your project? Contact me for expert advice and guidance in choosing the right approach for your construction project. Together, we will ensure a successful and well-managed execution!